James Purnell is often accused of being a closet Tory in the Labour Party, and I couldn't help noticing that in one of the many pictures of him published after his resignation, he seemed to be wearing a very Tory piece of jewellery, ie a pinky ring. On first glance this would seem to mark him out as a Normal Actually, as do his background (Guildford, accountant dad, private school and Balliol) and his serious approach to tennis. But maybe it's not quite so simple. Closer examination of the ring reveals it to be a contemporary, chunky, silver design, rather than the classic signet; it represents a Blairite update of tradition. Perhaps James's ring is saying "I work within the established system but recognize the need to be modern and up to date. Conservative businessmen - you are safe with me! Labour chaps - I might seem a bit posh at first, but I'm on your side." It might seem a trivial detail, but with politicians of all parties converging style-wise, such details can be important - just ask Hazel Blears. I wonder if this means there is a emerging sub-class of liberal(ish) Normal Actuallys?
Entries in Spellman (122)
There was some more news in the paper today about the 2010 Olympics costing more money, or not having enough sponsors or something. Thinking about London 2012 makes me feel weirdly anxious. it has done ever since I watched the bit with the bus, Jimmy Page, Leona Lewis, dancers etc etc at the end of the Beijing games last summer. I don't want to be negative, but I have to say I thought it was awful. I always find it a bit cringeworthy when posh people start trying to mix it with trendiness. Remember those terrible pop culture floats at the Queen's Golden Jubilee celebrations? It seems to me that Britain is very good at posh people, and it is very good at trendy people, but when the two come together it reminds me of the teachers trying to dance at school discos. Can't they just put Chris Hoy in charge of it all?